Doctors pose 'serious tax risk', claims HMRC

 

There are solid grounds for targeting doctors and dentists who have not declared all their income, according to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC).

Doctors pose 'serious tax risk', claims HMRC

Speaking in London last week at a roundtable discussion about HMRC's Tax Health Plan (THP), permanent secretary for tax Dave Hartnett said: ‘A common feature of all our campaigns is that they address a sector or a group where there is a serious tax risk.'

Under the THP, which was announced in January, doctors and dentists who have failed to disclose all their earnings have until 31 March 2010 to notify HMRC that they wish to make a disclosure. They then have a further three months to 30 June to submit it their disclosure and make full payment.

If they do this, the tax penalty they face is just 10% of the amount of tax owed. If they do not take the opportunity offered under the THP, Mr Hartnett said HMRC would go after the individuals concerned across the country, using the information that it holds about them.

If this is the case, GPs who are found to owe tax on income going back for up to 20 years could face a maximum penalty of 100% of the tax owed (on top of full repayment of the debt and interest charged on it).

‘Our campaigns are an opportunity for people to get their tax affairs right,' said Mr Hartnett.

BMA private practice committee chairman Derek Machin who attended the discussion said he had initially understood all professions, not just medical and dental were to be targeted in this particular HMRC campaign. ‘There's been a lot of comment about why doctors, and why doctors now.'

Mr Hartnett said that HMRC had to start somewhere and it expects to look at a variety of groups in the trade sector as well as at the professions.

‘There is no particular reason why doctors and dentists are first.

‘We've risk assessed doctors and dentists and we've found there is a material level of non-compliance in various ways'. He added that HMRC had obtained data suggesting that the problem for this group was bigger than it had first thought.

Asked whether the many GPs who are self-employed and in partnerships had any bearing, Mr Hartnett said this was not a risk factor.

X

You must log in to add to your CPD Organiser

All Comments

Martin Gray

Martin Gray - 08 March 2010

I doubt very much if doctors or dentists do work for 'cash inhand' like a great many other professionals \(is that the correct term for a builder or plumber?) do.

Healthcare professionals are easier targets as it is far more difficult to 'cook the books' due to the legilites and possibility of malpractice suits is it not?

Although I'm not a GP, or a doctor in any sence of the word, I can see a certain easy target policy at work; one where it can be sued to trial this process. Afterall, GPs especially have been the cause of much furore over services provided since their new contracvt was implemented. The governmant has been hell bent at trying to get back some of the money they have squandered in the past on healthcare provision.

Shortage of nurses? Scarp NHS Direct for a start. Those nurses would be far better utilised in the practical clinical settings rather than being paid a high hourly rate for answering telephone enquiries, they would also benefit from utilising their expencive training and qualifications in those clinical environments. And there would be more money available to fund more hospital beds!!

Try targetting those that CAN fiddle the system rather than those that cannot. It might just encourage doctors to stay in this country, pay their staff more appropriately, and get the NHS back on its feet to become the healthcare model it once was to the rest of civilisation.

 

Gary Young - 08 March 2010

This isn't that GPs pose a tax risk in the same way a dodgy painter and decorater or used car salesman \(or even MP) does, it's about associating GPs with these untrusted types in an attempt to erode public trust in GPs. Defend the profession on the trust issue and let accountants defend you as individuals against the tax collector, but don't confuse the two.

 

john oakley - 08 March 2010

I wonder if HMRC would specify the grounds/data on which they base their allegations that "there are solid grounds for targetting Doctors and Dentists who have not declared all their income"?

If we are to be targetted it seems fair that we should know the grounds for this, otherwise it raises suspicions that we are being subjected to yet another "witch hunt" based purely on political motives.

 

Comments

To post comments please log in here

MIMS Drug Search

Possible searches include drugs (by brand, generic ingredient or drug class), diseases and more.

Bulletins

Select the bulletins you are interested in, enter your email address and click the button below.

Log in here if you already have an account

Preview
Preview
Preview
Preview
Preview
Preview
Preview
Preview
Preview
 

Directory