Abnormal uterine bleeding
Contributed by Mr Antonio V Antoniou, consultant gynaecologist and lead in minimal access surgery an... Read more
In April the High Court ruled that health secretary Patricia Hewitt acted unlawfully in 2006 when she retrospectively capped the ‘dynamising factor’, used to calculate inflationary increases in pensions, for the period 2003/06. It ordered the government to remove the cap, increasing the pensions of GPs who retired during these years.
The ruling does not apply to the dynamising factor for 2006/8, however.
Now the government looks set to clawback some of the increased dynamisation it has been forced to pay in earlier years.
In last week’s letter to the profession, GPC chairman Dr Laurence Buckman wrote that the health secretary plans set dynamisation at 1 for those years.
This replaces earlier calculations of a 14 per cent increase over the two-year period. As a result, the compound dynamisation for the years 2003/6 will be the same as that for 2003/8.
jonn.elledge@haymarket.com
Comment below and tell us what you think
Quick search - use * for an abbreviated search, eg nico*
Quick search - use * for an abbreviated search, eg nico*
Contributed by Mr Antonio V Antoniou, consultant gynaecologist and lead in minimal access surgery an... Read more
Dr Mark Ritchie, GPSI in pain management, Morriston, Swansea Read more
Contributed by Dr Mark Ritchie, GPSI in pain management, Morriston, Swansea Read more
Janssen-Cilag has launched Stelara for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis where ot... Read more
Nicorette Invisipatch is the latest addition to the range of available nicotine replacement therapy ... Read more
Flamasacard, a prolonged-release formulation of aspirin, for secondary prophylaxis after a first cor... Read more
Comments
Niall Finegan
14/08/2008
discgraceful, dishonest, lan diengenious. ld they do the same to their own pensions
call it aash and grab raid
david gregson
07/10/2008
My concern is the proposed capping of dynamisation factor to 1 for the years 2006-7 and 2007-2008.
My accountant tells me that profits have risen slightly during that period.
My contributions also rose during that time in line with profits and I paid those contributions with a reasonable expectation that the Government would honour their part of the contract ie increase pension in line with increased profits.
Although most GPs benefit from the overall settlement \(self included) and will if continuing in general practice will benefit from indexing in the future it leaves a small group of GPs with a relatively large loss of pension, no indexing since 2006 and dynamising factor of 1 only. This is in effect giving GPs a 2008 pension at 2006 levels..ie 2006 pension -minus inflation! \(having paid contributions at 2007/2008 levels)
Only registered users may comment. Log in now or register for a free account.
There are problems with your form submission.
Please review the errors shown below.